首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

蒸气压缩式和溴化锂吸收式冷水机组的节能分析
引用本文:张登春,王海桥.蒸气压缩式和溴化锂吸收式冷水机组的节能分析[J].湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版),1998(2).
作者姓名:张登春  王海桥
作者单位:湘潭矿业学院资源工程系
摘    要:在大、中型中央空调工程中,制冷机组的能耗一直是人们关心的问题.不少媒介宣称吸收式冷水机组比蒸气压缩式冷水机组节能,是中央空调发展的方向.本文通过对各种制冷机组的矿物能源能效比进行比较,并进行计算列表分析,结果表明溴化锂吸收式冷水机组比蒸气压缩式冷水机组节电不节能.图3,表1,参6.

关 键 词:节能  冷水机组  矿物能源能效比

ENERGY ECONOMICAL ANALYSIS OF VAPOR COMPRESSION AND LIBR ABSORPTION REFRIGERATION SYSTEM
Zhang Dengchun,Wang Haiqiao.ENERGY ECONOMICAL ANALYSIS OF VAPOR COMPRESSION AND LIBR ABSORPTION REFRIGERATION SYSTEM[J].Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology(Natural Science Editon),1998(2).
Authors:Zhang Dengchun  Wang Haiqiao
Abstract:In large and middle central air-conditioning engineering, the energy consumption of refrigeration system is always a concerned question. Many people assert that the LiBr absorption refrigeration is more economical than vapor compression in saving energy, and is the direction of central air-conditioning development. In this paper, comparison of mineral energy efficiency ratio from kinds of refrigeration systems computation result is shown in table. The result shows that the power of LiBr absorption refrigeration is saved but the energy is not more economical than vapor compression refrigeration system. 3figs., 1tab., 6refs.
Keywords:energy economical  refrigeration system  mineral energy efficiency ratio
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号