首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

三种常用方法保存临床常见菌种的比较
引用本文:彭俊华,薛荣利,张媛媛,朱晓红,李泽慧.三种常用方法保存临床常见菌种的比较[J].甘肃科学学报,2012(3):88-90.
作者姓名:彭俊华  薛荣利  张媛媛  朱晓红  李泽慧
作者单位:兰州军区兰州总医院检验科
摘    要:比较3种保存临床常见菌种常用方法.临床分离非苛养菌550株分别用半固体琼脂法、细菌湿种牛奶冻存法和纸片冻存法进行保存,比较保存1个月、12个月、36个月后3种方法的菌种存活率.半固体琼脂法、细菌湿种牛奶冻存法和纸片冻存法保存1个月时的菌株平均存活率分别为98.6%、100%和100%,36个月时的菌株平均存活率分别为45.1%、90.6%和86.1%.冻存法在长时间保存菌株时效果明显优于半固体琼脂法,3种方法对化脓性链球菌的保存效果不佳.结果表明,3种方法均能很好地保存临床常见菌,方法简便易行,各实验室可依具体要求选用.

关 键 词:菌种保存  细菌存活率  冻存法

Comparison of Three Methods for Common Clinical Bacterial Preservation
PENG Jun-hua,XUE Rong-li,ZHANG Yuan-yuan,ZHU Xiao-hong,LI Ze-hui.Comparison of Three Methods for Common Clinical Bacterial Preservation[J].Journal of Gansu Sciences,2012(3):88-90.
Authors:PENG Jun-hua  XUE Rong-li  ZHANG Yuan-yuan  ZHU Xiao-hong  LI Ze-hui
Institution:(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Lanzhou General Hospital,Lanzhou Command,PLA,Lanzhou 730050,China)
Abstract:Three ordinary methods of preverving common clinical bacteria were compared.The semi-solid method(SSM),the milk freezing method(MFM),and the paper freezing method(PFM) were used to preserve 550 strains of non-fastidious bacteria from clinical isolates.Their bacterial survival rates(BSR) were compared respectively after bacterial preservation for 1,12,36 months.The results showed that the BSR of SSM,MFM,PFM were 98.6%,100% and 100% after preserving for 1 month,respectively.The BSR of SSM,MFM,PFM were 45.1%,90.6% and 86.1% after preserving for 36 months,respectively.The storage effect of freezing methods was better than that of SSM after long time preservation.But for three methods,the preservation of streptococcus was not good.As a result,the three methods are good for the common clinical isolates;they are simple and feasible,so any laboratory can select them according to its specific requirements.
Keywords:bacterial preservation  bacterial survival rate  freezing method
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号