首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

克里普克论知识悖论
引用本文:刘东. 克里普克论知识悖论[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2012, 0(9): 11-15
作者姓名:刘东
作者单位:中国人民大学哲学院
基金项目:中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“二维模态逻辑及其哲学问题研究”(12XNH190)
摘    要:知识悖论及其解决涉及到知识论的核心问题。克里普克在一篇新作中对意外考试悖论进行了深刻分析,并指出这一悖论的产生是由于错误地使用了"知识的持久性"这一前提,并以此为基础提出了一种新的知识悖论,即独断论悖论。通过分析可见,克里普克对"知识的持久性"的反驳以经典的知识论为框架,面对经典知识论所遭受的强有力的挑战,克里普克对意外考试悖论的解决缺乏可靠的理论支撑。知识悖论触及的是知识论的核心问题,任何尝试性的解决方案都要重新思考知识的本质到底是什么。

关 键 词:意外考试悖论  独断论悖论  JTB理论  盖梯尔问题

Kripke on the Paradoxes of Knowledge
LIU Dong. Kripke on the Paradoxes of Knowledge[J]. Studies In Dialectics of Nature, 2012, 0(9): 11-15
Authors:LIU Dong
Affiliation:LIU Dong(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
Abstract:Paradoxes of knowledge and their solution involve core thesis of epistemology.In his latest paper,Kripke analyzed the surprise examination paradox deeply,and pointed out that this paradox was produced by using a false premise,which says that once someone knows a proposition,he will know it at any later time.Through analysis,we can conclude that Kripke’s refutation to that premise mainly based on classical theory of knowledge,namely JTB.Faced with forcing criticism of JTB,it’s obvious that Kripke’s refutation lacks theoretical support.Because of its connected with core thesis of epistemology,any solution to paradoxes of knowledge will re-exam what’s the knowledge essentially.
Keywords:Surprise Examination Paradox  The Dogmatism Paradox  Theory of JTB  Gettier Problem
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号