开放式群体决策研讨两种研讨模式有效性的实验研究

开放式群体决策研讨平台是“从定性到定量综合集成研讨厅体系”思想的重要体现,有同步和异步两种研讨模式．重点描述了在研讨个体特征相近、群体特征相似、研讨任务相同的条件下,两种研讨模式在影响决策绩效、研讨成员感觉两个方面的有效性实验比较研究,并建立了模糊综合评价模型．结果表明,在实验假定前提下,目前平台的同步研讨模式要比异步研讨模式更有效,两种研讨模式对不同环境变量的影响程度不同,可以通过调整环境变量来提高平台有效性,对于复杂问题,两种研讨模式配合、多次同步异步反复研讨,可以提高整体决策绩效。

An experimental exploration of validity in two argument modes under open group decision argumentation

The open group decision argumentation system reveals the thoughts of "meta-synthetic argumentation system". It involves two argument modes: synchronous argumentation and asynchronous argumentation. An experimental exploration of the validity in this two argument modes is described.The validity in decision (performance) and member's feelings under the conditions of similar member's character, similar group (character) and same argument task is compared. The result shows that the synchronous argumentation is more valid than the asynchronous mode at the experimental assumption, indicates that this two modes have different influence on the environment factors. The validity of the argumentation system can be improved by adjusting the environmental factors. The decision performance in solving complex problems can be increased by using (repenting) synchronous and asynchronous argumentation.