“政产学”协同对创业活跃度的影响——基于三螺旋视角的定性比较分析

为探讨影响省份间创业活跃度差异的因果复杂机制，借鉴三螺旋理论，整合“政产学”3个层面的6个前因要素，应用组态思维和定性比较分析(QCA)方法进行分析.研究发现:单个“政产学”要素并不构成高创业活跃度的必要条件，各地区没有按照某一固定模式提升创业活跃度.高创业活跃度的驱动机制可以分为三条路径:“政学”协同主导型、“政产”协同主导型与“产学”协同主导型.现阶段没有任何一个地区的高创业活跃度是通过“政产学”三者完美协同提升的，仅限于其中两者间协同运转.

Influence of"Government-Industry-University"Cooperation on Entrepreneurial Activity:Qualitative Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Triple Helix

To explore the complex causal mechanism that affects the differences in entrepreneurial activity among regions， based on the triple helix theory， the configuration thinking and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method are used to integrate six conditional variables at three levels of government-industry-university. Results found that: any single element of government-industry-university does not constitute a necessary condition for high entrepreneurial activity in regions， and regions have not increased entrepreneurial activity in accordance with a certain fixed pattern. The driving mechanism of high entrepreneurial activity can be divided into three paths: “government-university” coordination-driven path， “government-industry” coordination-driven path and “industry-university” coordination-driven path. At present， no region uses the perfect synergy of “government-industry-university” to achieve high entrepreneurial activity， and it is limited to the coordinated operation of the two.