首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论犯罪既遂的判断标准
引用本文:袁彬.论犯罪既遂的判断标准[J].杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版),2005(2):33-36.
作者姓名:袁彬
作者单位:中国政法大学,刑事司法学院,北京,100088
摘    要:传统的既遂构成要件说在认定犯罪既遂的标准上面临着理论的困境,应为目的说所代替。犯罪目的可分为直接目的和间接目的,直接目的是任何一个直接故意犯罪所必需的,并且只有一个。犯罪直接目的的实现是犯罪既遂与否的判断标准。根据既遂的目的说,我国犯罪既遂类型可分为着手犯、行为犯、危险犯和实害犯。目的犯的既遂标准是目的犯直接目的的实现,而非法律所规定的间接目的的实现

关 键 词:犯罪既遂  构成要件说  目的说  直接目的  间接目的
文章编号:1293/Z(2005)02-0033-04
修稿时间:2004年5月8日

On Standard of Accomplishment of Crime
YUAN Bin.On Standard of Accomplishment of Crime[J].Journal of Hangzhou Teachers College(Humanities and Social Sciences),2005(2):33-36.
Authors:YUAN Bin
Abstract:The traditional doctrine of accomplishment of crime is in a mess and should be replaced by the purpose doctrine. Crime purpose may be divided into direct purpose and indirect purpose. Direct purpose consists in any direct intention crime and there is only one. Accomplishment of crime means that direct purpose of crime becomes true. If taking the purpose doctrine, the types of accomplishment of crime concludes leadoff crime, behavior crime, danger crime and damage crime. The standard of accomplishment in purpose crime is the realization of direct purpose of crime, not indirect purpose that has been stipulated in the criminal law.
Keywords:accomplishment of crime  element doctrine  purpose doctrine  direct purpose  indirect purpose
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号