英、美国立医学科研机构绩效评价体系的比较及借鉴

 国立医学科研机构指由国家建立并资助的医学科研机构，其有组织、规模化地开展科研活动，如美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）和英国医学理事会（MRC）。2013年以来，中国也相继在11个疾病领域建设起32个国家临床医学研究中心（NCRC），旨在强化中国医学创新能力、加快卫生健康科技成果转化、提升基层医疗服务水平。科学的绩效评价是引导和推动国立医学科研机构建设、发展的重要手段。本研究概述了NIH与MRC的绩效评价体系，介绍了两种评价体系的评价内容与指标框架，在对比的基础上，提出了中国临床医学研究中心的绩效管理工作的建议。

Performance evaluation systems of national medical institutes in UK and US

National medical institutes refer to the medical scientific research institutions which are established and funded by the state, embody the state's will, and implement scientific research activities in an organized way, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the USA and the British Medical Council (MRC) in the UK. Since 2013, China has built 32 national clinical research centers (NCRC's) for 11 diseases to strengthen its ability of medical innovation, accelerate the transformation of health and health science and technology, and improve the level of medical service at the grass-roots level. Scientific performance evaluation is an utmost important way to guide and promote the construction and development of national medical research institutions. This paper summarizes the performance evaluation systems of the NIH and MRC and focuses on the evaluation contents and the index frameworks of both evaluation systems. Through comparison this paper is expected to provide an essential reference for the decision-maker to promote the performance management of national clinical research centers in China.