| 如何客观公正评价生命科学基础研究成果 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 江虎军,冯锋,董尔丹. 如何客观公正评价生命科学基础研究成果[J]. 中国基础科学, 2010, 12(5): 49-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2412.2010.05.012 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 江虎军 冯锋 董尔丹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 国家自然科学基金委员会医学科学部,北京100085 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文分析了现在生命科学基础研究成果的组成,认为SCI论文尽管很重要,但不应该成为基础研究成果评价中的唯一指标,而且这种过分的强调已给我国基础研究的发展带来许多问题。为了能客观公正评价生命科学基础研究成果,除SCI论文外,评价系统中还要考虑研究的科学意义、研究者的研究态势、成果转化、人才培养、研究工作的系统性和基础研究文化等因素。
|
| 关 键 词： | 评价 生命科学 基础研究 |
How to Evaluate Fairly the Basic Research in Life Sciences |
| |
| Jiang Hujun,Feng Feng,Dong Erdan. How to Evaluate Fairly the Basic Research in Life Sciences[J]. China Basic Science, 2010, 12(5): 49-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2412.2010.05.012 |
| |
| Authors: | Jiang Hujun Feng Feng Dong Erdan |
| |
| Affiliation: | Deaprtment of Health Science,National Natural Science Foundation of China,Beijing 100085 |
| |
| Abstract: | After analyzing the composition of achievements for basic research in life sciences,we think SCI papers shouldn＇t be taken as the only criterion for research achievement review although very important,and over-emphasis for SCI papers has been rampant problems in the development of basic research in China.In order to evaluate fairly basic research achievements,several aspects,besides SCI papers,also including scientific merit and investigators＇ research trends,transfer of scientific achievements,basic research＇s culture and so on,should be covered in the review system. |
| |
| Keywords: | evaluate life sciences basic research |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
