首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于RMS关键特征偏好排序的重构方案评估方法
引用本文:王国新,黄思翰,商曦文,阎艳,杜景军.基于RMS关键特征偏好排序的重构方案评估方法[J].北京理工大学学报,2017,37(5):466-472.
作者姓名:王国新  黄思翰  商曦文  阎艳  杜景军
作者单位:北京理工大学机械与车辆学院,北京,100081;北京理工大学机械与车辆学院,北京,100081;北京理工大学机械与车辆学院,北京,100081;北京理工大学机械与车辆学院,北京,100081;北京理工大学机械与车辆学院,北京,100081
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51105039)
摘    要:针对如何构建反映可重构制造系统本质特性的评估指标定量模型,以及某一重构方案相对其他方案优势和劣势都绝对明显情况下如何实现多方案优选的问题,提出一种基于RMS关键特征偏好排序的重构方案评估方法.在综合考虑可重构机床组件调整、制造单元调整基础上,建立衡量RMS可缩放性、可转换性、可诊断性、模块化、可集成性和定制化等特征的量化模型,以此为基础形成重构方案的评估指标,并采用层次分析法分配评估指标权重.评估过程中,先从局部采用部分偏好排序评估方法分别对方案的优势和劣势进行评估,然后从整体上通过完全偏好排序评估方法对重构方案的净优势进行评估,最终得出重构方案的综合评估结果.并以某研究所RMS车间为例,阐述了该方法的实施过程并验证其有效性和实用性. 

关 键 词:可重构制造系统  重构方案评估  层次分析法
收稿时间:2015/10/28 0:00:00

Reconfiguration Plan Evaluation Based on Preference Ranking of Key Characteristics in Reconfigurable Manufacturing System
WANG Guo-xin,HUANG Si-han,SHANG Xi-wen,YAN Yan and DU Jing-jun.Reconfiguration Plan Evaluation Based on Preference Ranking of Key Characteristics in Reconfigurable Manufacturing System[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Natural Science Edition),2017,37(5):466-472.
Authors:WANG Guo-xin  HUANG Si-han  SHANG Xi-wen  YAN Yan and DU Jing-jun
Institution:School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract:In order to develop a quantitative evaluation index model for the essential characters of RMS (reconfigurable manufacturing system) and to optimally select the configuration plans with their outstanding advantage and disadvantage comparison,an evaluation method was proposed based on PROMETHEE (preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation).Analyzing the reconfiguration of the reconfigurable machine tool and manufacturing cell,a basic evaluation index and the quantitative model was designed to take the key characters of RMS,scalability,convertibility,diagnosability,modularity,integrability and customization.AHP (analytic hierarchy process) was used to assign the weight for these indexes.In the evaluation process,PROMETHEE I was applied firstly to analyze the advantage and disadvantage for each alternative plan.Secondly,PROMETHEE Ⅱ was adopted to analyze the comprehensive advantage.Finally,the sequence of alternative plans was decided based on the analyzed results.A case study from a shop floor of an institute was presented to validate the effectiveness and practicability.
Keywords:reconfigurable manufacturing system(RMS)  RMS evaluation  analytic hierarchy process(AHP)
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号