| 刑法解释的创造性限度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 闫显明.刑法解释的创造性限度[J].浙江万里学院学报,2003,16(3):105-107. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 闫显明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江万里学院,浙江,宁波,315100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 关于类推解释、扩张解释的含义及其关系，存在着理解上的混乱，文章澄清了这一混乱；罪刑法定主义原则禁止类推，但允许扩张解释，这是刑法解释的创造性的限度；文章提出了区分扩张主义解释与类推解释的界限的独到见解。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑法解释 类推解释 扩张解释 罪刑法定主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-2250(2003)03-0105-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年2月19日 |
The Creative Limitation of the Criminal Law Interpretation |
| |
| YAN Xian-ming.The Creative Limitation of the Criminal Law Interpretation[J].Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University,2003,16(3):105-107. |
| |
| Authors: | YAN Xian-ming |
| |
| Abstract: | There are some differences in understanding the concepts of analogy interpretation and the broadening interpretation. The author clarifies some misunderstandings. On principle of criminal law interpretation , analogy interpretation should be forbidden while broadening interpretation permitted. The author also advances some regularities on differentiates the two. |
| |
| Keywords: | interpretation of criminal law analogy interpretation broadening interpretation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
