首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

复合地层双模盾构与复合盾构刀具磨损对比
引用本文:康潇月,张逸飞,马杲宇,姚超凡,张中安,何川,杨明杰.复合地层双模盾构与复合盾构刀具磨损对比[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(33):14437-14442.
作者姓名:康潇月  张逸飞  马杲宇  姚超凡  张中安  何川  杨明杰
作者单位:西南交通大学交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室;深圳市地铁集团有限公司;南宁轨道交通建设有限公司
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52108384);四川省自然科学基金(2022NSFSC1020)
摘    要:软硬交替复合地层中可采用双模盾构和复合式盾构进行掘进施工。然而目前针对双模盾构和复合盾构在软硬交替地层中的适应性缺乏清晰明确的现场掘进数据进行对比验证,特别是施工参数和刀具磨损方面。基于深圳地铁12号线相似地层的3个相邻盾构区间工程,对比不同盾构机的盾构掘进施工参数、刀具服役情况及岩渣形态,分析刀具磨损的原因及特征,并进一步对比在长距离软硬交叠地层下EPB/TBM双模盾构和复合EPB盾构的掘进效能。结果表明:双模盾构TBM模式在岩质地层中的推进速度可达到双模盾构EPB模式的2倍及复合EPB盾构的3倍。受土仓压力和刀盘转速影响,刀盘推力和扭矩差异较大的双模EPB模式和复合EPB盾构更易造成刀具异常磨损。双模盾构TBM模式滚刀磨损速度更低,其刀具寿命是双模盾构EPB模式和复合EPB盾构的3~5倍,换刀时间占比为后两者的3/8~1/2,EPB/TBM双模盾构总体掘进效能优于复合EPB盾构。双模盾构TBM模式的岩渣中岩片更多且形状细长而扁平,在岩石地层中EPB/TBM双模盾构掘进效率优于复合EPB盾构。

关 键 词:复合地层  EPB/TBM双模盾构  复合盾构  刀具磨损  掘进效能
收稿时间:2022/12/27 0:00:00
修稿时间:2023/9/1 0:00:00

Comparative study on tool wear of dual-mode shield and composite shield in composite strata
Kang Xiaoyue,Zhang Yifei,Ma Gaoyu,Yao Chaofan,Zhang Zhongan,He Chuan,Yang Mingjie.Comparative study on tool wear of dual-mode shield and composite shield in composite strata[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2023,23(33):14437-14442.
Authors:Kang Xiaoyue  Zhang Yifei  Ma Gaoyu  Yao Chaofan  Zhang Zhongan  He Chuan  Yang Mingjie
Institution:Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University;Shenzhen Metro Group Co.,Ltd; Nanning Rail Transit Construction Co., Ltd
Abstract:Dual-mode shield and composite shield could be used for tunneling in soft hard alternate composite strata. However, at present, there was a lack of clear and definite field excavation data to compare and verify the adaptability of dual-mode shield and composite shield in soft and hard alternate strata, especially in construction parameters and tool wear. Based on three adjacent shield section projects in similar strata of Shenzhen Metro Line 12, this paper compared the shield tunneling construction parameters, tool service conditions and rock slag morphology of different shield machines, analyzed the causes and characteristics of tool wear, and further compared the tunneling efficiency of EPB/TBM dual-mode shield and composite EPB shield in the long distance soft and hard overlapping strata. The results show that: (1) The advance speed of the dual-mode TBM mode in the rock stratum can be twice that of the dual-mode EPB mode and three times that of the composite EPB mode. The EPB mode and composite EPB shield with large difference in thrust and torque of the cutter head are more likely to cause abnormal tool wear due to the influence of the soil bin pressure and cutter head speed. (2) The TBM mode hob of the dual-mode shield has lower wear rate, its tool life is 3-5 times that of the EPB mode of the dual-mode shield and the composite EPB shield, and the tool change time accounts for about 1/2~3/8 of the latter two. The overall tunneling efficiency of the EPB/TBM dual-mode shield is better than that of the composite EPB shield. (3) The rock fragments in the rock slag of the dual-mode shield TBM mode are more thin and flat, and the EPB/TBM dual-mode shield tunneling efficiency is better than the composite EPB shield in the rock stratum.
Keywords:compound stratum  EPB/TBM dual-mode shield  composite shield  tool wear  excavation efficiency
点击此处可从《科学技术与工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科学技术与工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号