The wedge and the vis viva controversy: how concepts of force influenced the practice of early eighteenth-century mechanics |
| |
Authors: | Email author" target="_blank">Jip?van?BesouwEmail author |
| |
Institution: | 1.Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science,Vrije Universiteit Brussel,Brussels,Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | This article discusses the quest for the mechanical advantage of the wedge in the eighteenth century. As a case study, the wedge enlightens our understanding of eighteenth-century mechanics in general and the controversy over “force” or vis viva in particular. In this article, I show that the two different approaches to mechanics, the one that favoured force in terms of velocities and the one that primarily used displacements—known as the ‘Newtonian’ and ‘Leibnizian’ methods, respectively—were not at all on par in their ability to solve the problem of the wedge. In general, only those who used the Leibnizian concept of force or some related notion were able to get to the conventional results. This article thus rebuts the received view that the vis viva controversy was merely a semantic one. Instead, it shows that different understandings of “force” led to real and pragmatic differences in eighteenth-century mechanics. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|