| 培养"君子",还是培养"新民"?--孔子与梁启超德育目标比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈勇军.培养"君子",还是培养"新民"?--孔子与梁启超德育目标比较[J].新余高专学报,2006,11(2):86-88. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈勇军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 贵州民族学院,马列部,贵州,贵阳,550025 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “君子”和“新民”分别是孔子和梁启超提出的理想德性人格。这两种理想人格,在提出逻辑、内涵体系、政治命运等方面,既具有相同点,又有不同点。之所以如此,在于他们所处的时代和各自政治理想各有异同。我国当前的公民道德建设,要借鉴他们的思想逻辑,对其思想加以批判和继承,避免走向极端。
|
| 关 键 词： | 君子 新民 孔子 梁启超 德育目标 理想德性人格 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6765(2006)02-0086-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 12 14 2005 12:00AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年12月14 |
A comparison of moral education targets advocated by Confucian and Liang Qichao |
| |
| CHEN Yong-jun.A comparison of moral education targets advocated by Confucian and Liang Qichao[J].Journal of XinYu College,2006,11(2):86-88. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Yong-jun |
| |
| Institution: | Guizhou Minorities Institute, Guiyang 550025, china |
| |
| Abstract: | Abstract: "Gentlemen" and "new citizens" are the ideal moral characters advocated by Confucian and Liang Qichao.Such characters have similarities and differences in logic,connotation system,politic fate,etc.because the times in which they lived and their politic ideals were same as well as different.The citizens' moral building of our country at present should borrow and inherit their ideological logic in a critical way so as to avoid going to extremes. |
| |
| Keywords: | gentlemen new citizens Confucian Liang Qichao moral education target ideal moral characters |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
