首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

结构拟动力实验数值积分方法的比较研究
引用本文:祝辉,杨佑发.结构拟动力实验数值积分方法的比较研究[J].实验科学与技术,2009,7(3):40-43.
作者姓名:祝辉  杨佑发
作者单位:重庆大学土木工程学院,重庆,400045
摘    要:在对结构拟动力实验显式数值积分方法的理论推导的基础上,通过数值计算分别对中央差分法、显式Newmark法、双卢参数法的稳定性和计算精度进行了比较研究。计算结果表明:中央差分法和显式Newmark法稳定条件为/2〈2,双口参数法是无条件稳定的;当力〈0.8,3种方法都具有良好的计算精度。

关 键 词:拟动力实验  数值积分方法  稳定性  计算精度

Comparative Study on the Numerical Integration Algorithms for Structural Pseudo-dynamic Test
ZHU Hui,YANG You-fa.Comparative Study on the Numerical Integration Algorithms for Structural Pseudo-dynamic Test[J].Experiment Science & Technology,2009,7(3):40-43.
Authors:ZHU Hui  YANG You-fa
Institution:( College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)
Abstract:Based on the theoretical derivation of the explicit numerical integration algorithms in the structural pseudo - dynamic test, we carry on studies on comparing the stability and the calculating accuracy of the center different algorithm, the explicit Newmark algo- rithm and the double fl parameters algorithm by the numerical calculating. As the results show, the center different algorithm and the explicit Newmark algorithm meet the condition of stability that Ω is less than 2, while the double β parameters algorithm is unconditional stable. When .Ω is less than 0. 8, these algorithms have the same good calculating precision.
Keywords:pseudo- dynamic test  numerical integration algorithm  stability  calculating accuracy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号