首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于CoES模型的我国金融系统性风险度量
引用本文:张冰洁,汪寿阳,魏云捷,赵雪婷.基于CoES模型的我国金融系统性风险度量[J].系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(3):565-575.
作者姓名:张冰洁  汪寿阳  魏云捷  赵雪婷
作者单位:1. 北京航空航天大学 经济管理学院, 北京 100191;2. 中国科学院 数学与系统科学研究院, 北京 100190;3. 中国科学院 预测科学研究中心, 北京 100190;4. 中央财经大学 经济学院, 北京 100081
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(71390330,71390331)
摘    要:为了更加准确地度量金融系统性风险,预防灾难性金融风险事件发生,本文基于尾部损失的均值提出了一个新的度量系统性风险的方法——CoES模型,相对于传统的CoVaR模型来说,该方法更关注尾部损失的均值而不仅仅是单一分位点上的期望损失,能够更加准确地捕捉系统性风险,为金融系统监管提供更为有效的信息.最后,本文将该方法用于度量2007-2016年间共21个金融机构对我国金融市场系统性风险的贡献.研究结果发现:1)CoVaR模型可能低估了金融机构的系统性风险;2)当银行行业受到冲击时,其对整个金融系统造成的风险最大,其次是保险,房地产和多元金融行业;3)在银行行业中,对系统性风险贡献最大的当属工商银行和中国银行,应对其进行重点监管;4)相对于银行和房地产行业,保险行业和多元金融行业自身的VaR值较高,但对金融系统性风险的贡献较低,因此应注意对其自身风险的管理.

关 键 词:  CoES    CoVaR  系统性风险  金融机构  
收稿时间:2017-09-19

Measuring the systemic risk contribution of financial institutes in China based on CoES model
ZHANG Bingjie,WANG Shouyang,WEI Yunjie,ZHAO Xueting.Measuring the systemic risk contribution of financial institutes in China based on CoES model[J].Systems Engineering —Theory & Practice,2018,38(3):565-575.
Authors:ZHANG Bingjie  WANG Shouyang  WEI Yunjie  ZHAO Xueting
Institution:1. School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;2. Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;3. Center for Forecasting Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;4. School of Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract:To measure the systemic risk contribution of the financial institutes in China more accurately and to avoid financial risk events, a new method named CoES model is proposed based on the mean value of tail loss. Compared to the traditional CoVaR model, this method pays more attention to the mean value of tail loss than the expected loss on one single quantile, which could provide more accurate information for the supervision when capturing the systemic risk of financial system. The new method is utilized to measure the systemic risk contributions of 21 financial institutions in China from 2007 to 2016. The empirical results show that:1) the CoVaR model may underestimate the systemic risk of financial institutes; 2) the banking industry brings the largest systemic risk contribution to the whole financial system, followed by insurance, real estate and diversified financial industry; 3) among banking industry, the systemic risk contributions of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Bank of China are the largest, which should be the key regulatory objects; 4) compared with the banking and real estate industry, the insurance industry and the diversified financial industry own higher VaR value and their systemic risk contributions are relatively lower, so the regulators could pay more attention to their own risk management.
Keywords:△ CoES  △ CoVaR  systemic risk  financial institutes  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号