Accountability and values in radically collaborative research |
| |
Authors: | Eric Winsberg Bryce Huebner Rebecca Kukla |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, United States;2. Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, United States;1. Department of Philosophy, 135 Baker Hall, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, USA;2. Department of Philosophy, Wichita State University, 1845 North Fairmount, Campus Box 74, Wichita, KS 67260-0074, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This paper discusses a crisis of accountability that arises when scientific collaborations are massively epistemically distributed. We argue that social models of epistemic collaboration, which are social analogs to what Patrick Suppes called a “model of the experiment,” must play a role in creating accountability in these contexts. We also argue that these social models must accommodate the fact that the various agents in a collaborative project often have ineliminable, messy, and conflicting interests and values; any story about accountability in a massively distributed collaboration must therefore involve models of such interests and values and their methodological and epistemic effects. |
| |
Keywords: | Values Models Climate science Structure of theories Models of data Wisdom of crowds Biomedical research |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|