首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Accountability and values in radically collaborative research
Authors:Eric Winsberg  Bryce Huebner  Rebecca Kukla
Institution:1. Department of Philosophy, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, United States;2. Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, United States;1. Department of Philosophy, 135 Baker Hall, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, USA;2. Department of Philosophy, Wichita State University, 1845 North Fairmount, Campus Box 74, Wichita, KS 67260-0074, USA
Abstract:This paper discusses a crisis of accountability that arises when scientific collaborations are massively epistemically distributed. We argue that social models of epistemic collaboration, which are social analogs to what Patrick Suppes called a “model of the experiment,” must play a role in creating accountability in these contexts. We also argue that these social models must accommodate the fact that the various agents in a collaborative project often have ineliminable, messy, and conflicting interests and values; any story about accountability in a massively distributed collaboration must therefore involve models of such interests and values and their methodological and epistemic effects.
Keywords:Values  Models  Climate science  Structure of theories  Models of data  Wisdom of crowds  Biomedical research
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号