首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对传统民法买卖合同风险承担前提的质疑
引用本文:桑轶儒,焦武峰.对传统民法买卖合同风险承担前提的质疑[J].潍坊学院学报,2004,4(3):39-41.
作者姓名:桑轶儒  焦武峰
作者单位:苏州大学,江苏,苏州,215021
摘    要:传统民法将买卖合同风险承担的前提归结为合同的成立。但是在买卖合同成立后生效前,双方当事人并没有确立确定的债权债务关系,也就谈不上风险承担问题。买卖合同风险承担的前提应为合同的生效,只有在合同生效后,才产生确定的债权债务关系,风险承担才有意义。

关 键 词:传统民法  买卖合同  风险承担  合同成立  合同生效  债务关系
文章编号:1671-4288(2004)03-0039-03
修稿时间:2003年10月13

Query on Premise of Risk-Burden in Sale- Contract in Traditional Civil Law
SANG Yi-ru,JIAO Wu-feng Suzhou University,Suzhou ,China.Query on Premise of Risk-Burden in Sale- Contract in Traditional Civil Law[J].Journal of Weifang University,2004,4(3):39-41.
Authors:SANG Yi-ru  JIAO Wu-feng Suzhou University  Suzhou  China
Institution:SANG Yi-ru,JIAO Wu-feng Suzhou University,Suzhou 215021,China
Abstract:In accordance with traditional civil law, the risk - burden of sale contract shall be based on the establishment of the contract. However, during the period of after the establishment and prior to the effective- ness of contract, the relationship between the parties to the contract is still uncertain, let alone the matter of risk assumption. It is contended that the significance of risk assumption lies in the certainty of the rights as well as obligations of the parties, which can only result from an effective contract.
Keywords:risk assumption  contract establishment  contract execution  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号