Kuhnian theory-choice and virtue convergence: Facing the base rate fallacy |
| |
Authors: | Samuel Schindler |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA;2. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland;3. Modus Outcomes, Letchworth Garden City, UK |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Perhaps the strongest argument for scientific realism, the no-miracles-argument, has been said to commit the so-called base rate fallacy. The apparent elusiveness of the base rate of true theories has even been said to undermine the rationality of the entire realism debate. On the basis of the Kuhnian picture of theory choice, I confront this challenge by arguing that a theory is likely to be true if it possesses multiple theoretical virtues and is embraced by numerous scientists–even when the base rate converges to zero. |
| |
Keywords: | Scientific realism No miracle argument Base rate fallacy Theoretical virtues T.S. Kuhn Theory choice Convergence Witness testimony |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|