首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对“效用侵害说”之刑法诠释学根基的反思
引用本文:王振,武立松.对“效用侵害说”之刑法诠释学根基的反思[J].萍乡高等专科学校学报,2012,29(5):28-32.
作者姓名:王振  武立松
作者单位:江西科技师范大学法学院,江西南昌,330013
摘    要:在刑法解释学领域,针对我国刑法275条的故意毁坏财物罪的"毁坏"内涵的"效用侵害说"正成为有力的学说;但是,"效用侵害说"的法哲学基础是不牢靠的:因为一方面该学说赖以立足的本体论诠释学本身是欠科学的,另一方面是由于刑法哲学与刑法解释学并非同一层次的问题。

关 键 词:毁坏  效用侵害说  本体论诠释学  刑法诠释学

On Criminal Law Hermeneutics Foundation of the "Utility Infringement Doctrine"
Wang Zhen,Wu Lisong.On Criminal Law Hermeneutics Foundation of the "Utility Infringement Doctrine"[J].Journal of Pingxiang College,2012,29(5):28-32.
Authors:Wang Zhen  Wu Lisong
Institution:(Law school,Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University,Nanchang 330013,China)
Abstract:In the field of criminal law explanation, the"Utility Infringement Doctrine" has becoming a strong effecting theory to delimit "destruction" of the article 275 in Chinese criminal code. But the philosophy basic of the"Utility Infringement Doctrine" is not solid enough, because in one hand, the Ontological Hermeneutics itself is not scientific; On the other hand, philosophy of criminal law has not same essence to the criminal law explanation.
Keywords:destruction  utility infringement doctrine  ontological hermeneutics  criminal law hermeneutics foundation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号