The Frontier Movement and The American Values and Beliefs

This paper briefly accounts the background of American values and beliefs. It analyses the essence of the American ideals and points out that the American values are exaggerated and glamorized by the American upper class. They are in a sense, a dose of anaesthetic and a kind of hypocrisy.     

东莞理工学院在校大学生价值观调查评析

东莞作为改革开放阵地的前沿，信息的快速更替，势必冲吉人们固有的观念，作为东莞社会思潮最敏感的载体－－东莞理工学院大学生，他们的人生价值取向如何，是本文的关注，本文通过问产工调查，试图向大家剖析出在市场经济的影响下东莞理工学院大学生的道德观、文化观、就业观及金钱观等价值观念的现状，并力求从现状的思考中提出几点建议。     

灵魂在高处——郁达夫《故都的秋》解析

郁达夫的作品受争议较多,历年来一直有郁达夫作品难免颓丧消沉的评论。本文以《故都的秋》为例,解析了郁达夫精神世界当中的另一层面。看到他苦闷当中坚守的高尚情操,困境中仍不流于世俗的卓立精神以及对纯朴清淡的生活境界的真诚追求。     

Divergence of values and goals in participatory research

Public participation in scientific research has gained prominence in many scientific fields, but the theory of participatory research is still limited. In this paper, we suggest that the divergence of values and goals between academic researchers and public participants in research is key to analyzing the different forms this research takes. We examine two existing characterizations of participatory research: one in terms of public participants' role in the research, the other in terms of the virtues of the research. In our view, each of these captures an important feature of participatory research but is, on its own, limited in what features it takes into account. We introduce an expanded conception of norms of collaboration that extends to both academic researchers and public participants. We suggest that satisfying these norms requires consideration of the two groups' possibly divergent values and goals, and that a broad characterization of participatory research that starts from participants' values and goals can motivate both public participants’ role in the research and the virtues of the research. The resulting framework clarifies the similarities and differences among participatory projects and can help guide the responsible design of such projects.     

Accountability and values in radically collaborative research

This paper discusses a crisis of accountability that arises when scientific collaborations are massively epistemically distributed. We argue that social models of epistemic collaboration, which are social analogs to what Patrick Suppes called a “model of the experiment,” must play a role in creating accountability in these contexts. We also argue that these social models must accommodate the fact that the various agents in a collaborative project often have ineliminable, messy, and conflicting interests and values; any story about accountability in a massively distributed collaboration must therefore involve models of such interests and values and their methodological and epistemic effects.     

中西方价值观中集体主义和个体主义的对比分析

价值观念与文化密切相关,不同文化背景下的人会持有不同的价值观念。集体主义与个人主义,作为中西方不同文化的产物,集中体现了东西方价值观念的差异。但在现今社会,这两者间的差异性或对比性出现相融合的部分。本文通过实例进行对比分析,并提出一些观点以便于人们更好的认识中西方的价值观。     

矿山救护指挥员职业价值观问卷调查研究

职业价值观是职业在价值观中的体现,矿山救护人员是处理和抢救矿井火灾、水灾、瓦斯与煤尘爆炸、瓦斯突出与喷出等矿山灾害的专业队伍。矿山救护指挥员的决策直接影响救援行动的效果。本文针对被试的218名矿山救护队指挥员进行问卷调查,总结矿山救护指挥员的职业价值观的特点,发现制约矿山救护队发展的一些问题,为矿山救护队伍建设提供科学依据。     

关于中国古代文学史编写的几点思考

我国文学史的编写存在不少问题：一是在文学理念、缟写模式和文体分类上受西方影响太大，而顾度中国文学的实际不够；二是客观叙述不够，议论、阐释、评析太多，未尽可能地还原中国文学的历史面貌；三是在元、明、清文学的璃排上反映出明显的重小说、戏曲，轻诗、文、词、赋的倾向，背离了元、明、清文学仍以诗文为主体的基本事实。     

加工滚刀螺旋容屑槽时中凸值的计算

本文在求解滚刀螺旋容屑槽成形铣刀廓形的基础上,给出了成形铣刀廓形上各点中凸值及成形铣刀最大中凸值的求解方法,提出了用一条圆孤代替成形铣刀廓形的近似设计方法,并对代用圆孤进行了误差分析。