基于常规相参雷达实现目标横向一维成像

本文利用ＩＳＡＲ技术对常规相参雷达实现目标横向一维成像问题进行了研究，着重提出了一种基于回波相位差进行相位拟合的运动补偿方法。与以往的方法相比，这种方法具有运算量小，适用范围广等优点。     

“回归直线法”在公司理财中的应用研究

介绍了回归直线法的由来,给出了相关性检验的两种方法:相关系数法和方差分析法,在此基础上,又给出了误差估计的3种简单方法:最大误差法、平均误差法和标准差法,使“回归直线法”在公司理财中的广泛应用,不仅具有可操作性,同时更具有可靠性.     

Cartesian causation: body–body interaction, motion, and eternal truths

There is considerable debate among scholars over whether Descartes allowed for genuine body–body interaction. I begin by considering Michael Della Rocca’s recent claim that Descartes accepted such interaction, and that his doctrine of the creation of the eternal truths indicates how this interaction could be acceptable to him. Though I agree that Descartes was inclined to accept real bodily causes of motion, I differ from Della Rocca in emphasizing that his ontology ultimately does not allow for them. This is not the end of the story however, since two of Descartes’s successors offered incompatible ways of developing his conflicted account of motion. I contrast the occasionalist view of Nicolas Malebranche that changes in motion derive directly from divine volitions with the non-occasionalist claim of Pierre-Sylvain Regis that such changes derive from a nature distinct from God. In light of Della Rocca’s interpretation, it is noteworthy that the issue of eternal truths is relevant to both alternative accounts. Indeed, Regis took the doctrine that such truths are created to provide crucial support for his alternative to an occasionalist account of body–body interaction. What does not help Della Rocca, however, is that Regis’s view of motion requires a fundamental revision of Descartes’s ontology.     

一种改进的相对轨道动力学模型

线性化的Clohessey-Whiltshire(C-W)方程描述相对运动虽然方便,但是精度不高,为了解决这一问题,提出了一种C-W方程的改进形式。首先基于C-W方程的推导,分析了在对中心引力取近似的过程中导致原方程不准确的数学原因和物理现象;然后通过对简化部分的数量级进行分析和比较,将原推导过程中忽略掉的部分重要内容重新予以考虑,并运用数学变换将新加入的内容合并转化,最终给出了一组非齐次线性常系数微分方程,在不增加计算复杂度的情况下提高了精度。仿真验证表明该方程在圆轨道下相对于C-W方程精度改善很多,小椭圆轨道下也消除了C-W方程的长期误差。     

Time‐simultaneous prediction band for a time series

I propose principles and methods for the construction of a time‐simultaneous prediction band for a univariate time series. The methods are entirely based on a learning sample of time trajectories, and make no parametric assumption about its distribution. Hence, the methods are general and widely applicable. The expected coverage probability of a band can be estimated by a bootstrap procedure. The estimate is likely to be less than the nominal level. Expected lack of coverage can be compensated for by increasing the coverage in the learning sample. Applications to simulated and empirical data illustrate the methods. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

基于不同摄像机配置的空间点检测模型及精度研究

针对空间点检测问题给出了一种简便而精确的空间点检测方法并建立了实验环境下的数学模型,提出了视差为零时,所测得的空间点深度最接近真实值的假设,并得到如下结论：给定空间点,深度不变,基线越短,光轴的夹角越小；深度改变时,基线一定,则深度越长,夹角越小。推导出在不同基线、不同深度下摄像机光轴之间理想夹角的数学模型并通过实验进行了验证。该方法对实际双目检测系统的摄像机配置有一定的指导作用。     

原始地应力及力学参数的测定

本文根据孔壁应力解除法获得的量测应变,提出了采用最优化方法直接确定岩体的泊松比和原始地应力。实例表明,这样获得的原始地应力更符合实际——对应最小的量测残差。     

奇异矩阵的Krylov方法的误差分析比较

Krylov方法是求解线性方程组Ax=b,A∈CN×N,b∈CN的一种迭代方法,当A非奇异时,已有很好研究.而当A奇异或接近奇异阵时,在一定的假定条件下,Krylov方法的解与范教最小的最小二乘解A+b之间的差是可以估计出来的.     

高精度星形轮廓面数控加工方法研究

本文提出了计算星形轮廓面数控加工刀位的插补方法和刀具半径补偿方法，以及决定加工方法误差大小的走刀步长和刀具半径的确定准则，从而建立了该曲面的加工方法其理论加工精度为１μｍ．进给速度相对误差小于１％，在３３ＭＨＺ８０３８６ＣＰＵ（带８０３８７协处理器）上每计算一次刀位占用机时小于１．２ｍｓ．具有精度高和实时性好的特点．     

Descartes’s changing mind

Descartes is always concerned about knowledge. However, the Galileo affair in 1633, the reactions to his Discourse on method, and later his need to reply to objections to his Meditations provoked crises in Descartes’s intellectual development the import of which has not been sufficiently recognized. These events are the major reasons why Descartes’s philosophical position concerning how we know and what we may know is radically different at the end of his life from what it was when he began. We call this later position Descartes’s epistemic stance and contrast it with his earlier methodological, metaphysical realism. Yet Descartes’s epistemic views cannot be separated from other aspects of his work, for example, his views concerning God, causality, metaphysics, and the nature of science. A further meta-implication is that serious errors await any scholar who cites early Cartesian texts in support of late Cartesian positions, or who uses later texts in conjunction with early ones to support a reading of Descartes’s philosophy.