关于细集料砂当量指标的探讨

通过加土的方法得到不同泥土含量的集料，进行砂当量试验，并用不同砂当量值的集料制成成心性稀浆封层混合料进行湿轮磨耗试验，试验结果表明，砂当量与集料中的泥土含量存在良好的线性关系，是评价细集料洁净程度的有效方法，试验中集料级配和取样均匀程度会对试验结果产生一定影响，砂当量低的集料会使改性剂无法发 对心性稀浆封层混合料的改性效果，建议用于心性稀浆封层的的细集料砂当量不低于60％。     

老式油压材料试验机测试系统的技术改造

对老式油压材料试验机进行技术改造的方案是利用原试验机结构框架和加载系统。改进落后的测试系统使其达到现代科技水平。本文论述了进行改造的项目、工作原理、实施方法。方案一经买施．对拥有大量老式油压材料试验机的我国．其社会效益和经济效益都将是十分可观的。     

具有纳米结构的TiO2纤维光催化氧化活性

研究了具有纳米结构,高比表面的锐钛矿TiO2纤维在光催化降解苯酚体系中的氧化性能,发现其活性与P25相当;通过加羟基自由基猝灭剂证实了羟基自由基(HO·)对苯酚降解的贡献;而通过加空穴猝灭剂则观察到明显的空穴(h+)效应.并通过KI氧化反应进一步研究了催化剂表面上的空穴效应,结果表明,TiO2纤维上的光生空穴比P25稳定,其空穴量子产率是后者的3.3倍.     

中国经济持续发展中的生态环境问题与逆转战略

本文应用生态学、经济学、市场学、环境学、灾害学的观点，分析了中国经济发展中环境的面临的主要问题和退化症结，根据市场经济发展的要求，提出了生态环境上合理、经济效益上合算、整治技术上先进的对策，为综合整治中国生态环境提供基本思路。     

近终形连铸技术的发展状况

近终形连铸技术是当今冶金科技领域的一门前沿学科。本文介绍目前近终形连铸技术的发展及趋势。在世界各国的研究中，美国比较注重单辊法，日本侧重于双辊法，西欧则侧重于改进结晶器的结构和功能，开发新型铸机     

煤炭地下气化与制氢:技术集成与工艺耦合法

为了寻求清洁能源。充分利用煤炭资源，采用煤炭地下气化技术，通过应用膜分离法及PSA相结合方法来提高煤炭地下气化煤气中氢气质量分数。对于浓度低的，先用膜分离使其“提浓”，再进行PSA吸附，使其“提纯”。会得到高纯度氢气，同时其成本远远低于其他提氢方法。结果表明。煤炭地下气化方式制氢气是化石燃料制氢气的有效途径之一。     

论《阿Q正传》的喜剧性

针对一些人认为《阿Q正传》是悲剧的观点,明确认定《阿Q正传》是喜剧性质的,并对其喜剧性进行探讨,结合鲁迅先生创作动机,从作品的艺术风格和阿Q这个人物本身分析该作品的喜剧性以及用喜剧创作的艺术效果.     

Ruin Probability with Variable Premium Rate and Disturbed by Diffusion in a Markovian Environment

We consider a risk model with a premium rate which varies with the level of free reserves. In this model, the occurrence of claims is described by a Cox process with Markov intensity process, and the influence of stochastic factors is considered by adding a diffusion process. The integro-differential equation for the ruin probability is derived by a infinitesimal method.     

M-泛函的经验似然置信区间

利用经验似然思想，分别讨论不含附加信息和含附加信息时，M-泛函的经验似然置信区间，并推广Zhang Biao (1997) 在独立同分布下的结果。     

Newton's Easy Quadratures ``Omitted for the Sake of Brevity'

In the 1687 Principia, Newton gave a solution to the direct problem (given the orbit and center of force, find the central force) for a conic-section with a focal center of force (answer: a reciprocal square force) and for a spiral orbit with a polar center of force (answer: a reciprocal cube force). He did not, however, give solutions for the two corresponding inverse problems (given the force and center of force, find the orbit). He gave a cryptic solution to the inverse problem of a reciprocal cube force, but offered no solution for the reciprocal square force. Some take this omission as an indication that Newton could not solve the reciprocal square, for, they ask, why else would he not select this important problem? Others claim that ``it is child's play' for him, as evidenced by his 1671 catalogue of quadratures (tables of integrals). The answer to that question is obscured for all who attempt to work through Newton's published solution of the reciprocal cube force because it is done in the synthetic geometric style of the 1687 Principia rather than in the analytic algebraic style that Newton employed until 1671. In response to a request from David Gregory in 1694, however, Newton produced an analytic version of the body of the proof, but one which still had a geometric conclusion. Newton's charge is to find both ``the orbit' and ``the time in orbit.' In the determination of the dependence of the time on orbital position, t(r), Newton evaluated an integral of the form ∫dx/x <sup>n</sup> to calculate a finite algebraic equation for the area swept out as a function of the radius, but he did not write out the analytic expression for time t = t(r), even though he knew that the time t is proportional to that area. In the determination of the orbit, θ (r), Newton obtained an integral of the form ∫dx/√(1−x<sup>2</sup>) for the area that is proportional to the angle θ, an integral he had shown in his 1669 On Analysis by Infinite Equations to be equal to the arcsin(x). Since the solution must therefore contain a transcendental function, he knew that a finite algebraic solution for θ=θ(r) did not exist for ``the orbit' as it had for ``the time in orbit.' In contrast to these two solutions for the inverse cube force, however, it is not possible in the inverse square solution to generate a finite algebraic expression for either ``the orbit' or ``the time in orbit.' In fact, in Lemma 28, Newton offers a demonstration that the area of an ellipse cannot be given by a finite equation. I claim that the limitation of Lemma 28 forces Newton to reject the inverse square force as an example and to choose instead the reciprocal cube force as his example in Proposition 41. (Received August 14, 2002) Published online March 26, 2003 Communicated by G. Smith