Using Firm‐Level Leverage as an Investment Strategy

We use an investment strategy based on firm‐level capital structures. Investing in low‐leverage firms yields abnormal returns of 4.43% per annum. If an investor holds a portfolio of low‐leverage and low‐market‐to‐book‐ratio firms, abnormal returns increase to 16.18% per annum. A portfolio of low leverage and low market risk yields abnormal returns of 6.67% and a portfolio of small firms with low leverage earns 5.37% per annum. We use the Fama‐Macbeth (1973) methodology with modifications. We confirm that portfolios based on low leverage earn higher returns in longer investment horizons. Our results are robust to other risk factors and the risk class of the firm. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Does a lot help a lot? Forecasting stock returns with pooling strategies in a data‐rich environment

A variety of recent studies provide a skeptical view on the predictability of stock returns. Empirical evidence shows that most prediction models suffer from a loss of information, model uncertainty, and structural instability by relying on low‐dimensional information sets. In this study, we evaluate the predictive ability of various lately refined forecasting strategies, which handle these issues by incorporating information from many potential predictor variables simultaneously. We investigate whether forecasting strategies that (i) combine information and (ii) combine individual forecasts are useful to predict US stock returns, that is, the market excess return, size, value, and the momentum premium. Our results show that methods combining information have remarkable in‐sample predictive ability. However, the out‐of‐sample performance suffers from highly volatile forecast errors. Forecast combinations face a better bias–efficiency trade‐off, yielding a consistently superior forecast performance for the market excess return and the size premium even after the 1970s.     

Forecasting realized volatility of oil futures market: A new insight

In this study we propose several new variables, such as continuous realized semi‐variance and signed jump variations including jump tests, and construct a new heterogeneous autoregressive model for realized volatility models to investigate the impacts that those new variables have on forecasting oil price volatility. In‐sample results indicate that past negative returns have greater effects on future volatility than that of positive returns, and our new signed jump variations have a significantly negative influence on the future volatility. Out‐of‐sample empirical results with several robust checks demonstrate that our proposed models can not only obtain better performance in forecasting volatility but also garner larger economic values than can the existing models discussed in this paper.     

Monthly Beta Forecasting with Low‐, Medium‐ and High‐Frequency Stock Returns

This paper evaluates the accuracy of 1‐month‐ahead systematic (beta) risk forecasts in three return measurement settings; monthly, daily and 30 minutes. It was found that the popular Fama–MacBeth beta from 5 years of monthly returns generates the most accurate beta forecast among estimators based on monthly returns. A realized beta estimator from daily returns over the prior year generates the most accurate beta forecast among estimators based on daily returns. A realized beta estimator from 30‐minute returns over the prior 2 months generates the most accurate beta forecast among estimators based on 30‐minute returns. In environments where low‐, medium‐ and high‐frequency returns are accurately available, beta forecasting with low‐frequency returns are the least accurate and beta forecasting with high‐frequency returns are the most accurate. The improvements in precision of the beta forecasts are demonstrated in portfolio optimization for a targeted beta exposure. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

An analysis on the predictability of CAPM beta for momentum returns

This paper demonstrates that the forecasted capital asset pricing model (CAPM) beta of momentum portfolios explains a large portion of the return, ranging from 40% to 60% for stock‐level momentum, and from 30% to 50% for industry‐level momentum. Beta forecasts are from a realized beta estimator using daily returns over the prior year. Periods such as 1969–1989 have been found in earlier studies to contain abnormal profits from momentum trading; however, we show that these were spuriously generated by measurement error in systematic risk. These results cast further doubt on the ability of standard momentum trading strategies to generate abnormal profits.     

Forecasting volatility with outliers in GARCH models

In this paper, we detect and correct abnormal returns in 17 French stocks returns and the French index CAC40 from additive‐outlier detection method in GARCH models developed by Franses and Ghijsels (1999) and extended to innovative outliers by Charles and Darné (2005). We study the effects of outlying observations on several popular econometric tests. Moreover, we show that the parameters of the equation governing the volatility dynamics are biased when we do not take into account additive and innovative outliers. Finally, we show that the volatility forecast is better when the data are cleaned of outliers for several step‐ahead forecasts (short, medium‐ and long‐term) even if we consider a GARCH‐t process. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Out‐of‐sample volatility prediction: A new mixed‐frequency approach

This paper proposes a new mixed‐frequency approach to predict stock return volatilities out‐of‐sample. Based on the strategy of momentum of predictability (MoP), our mixed‐frequency approach has a model switching mechanism that switches between generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH)‐class models that only use low‐frequency data and heterogeneous autoregressive models of realized volatility (HAR‐RV)‐type that only use high‐frequency data. The MoP model simply selects a forecast with relatively good past performance between the GARCH‐class and HAR‐RV‐type forecasts. The model confidence set (MCS) test shows that our MoP strategy significantly outperforms the competing models, which is robust to various settings. The MoP test shows that a relatively good recent past forecasting performance of the GARCH‐class or HAR‐RV‐type model is significantly associated with a relatively good current performance, supporting the success of the MoP model.     

Yield curve forecast combinations based on bond portfolio performance

We propose an economically motivated forecast combination strategy in which model weights are related to portfolio returns obtained by a given forecast model. An empirical application based on an optimal mean–variance bond portfolio problem is used to highlight the advantages of the proposed approach with respect to combination methods based on statistical measures of forecast accuracy. We compute average net excess returns, standard deviation, and the Sharpe ratio of bond portfolios obtained with nine alternative yield curve specifications, as well as with 12 different forecast combination strategies. Return‐based forecast combination schemes clearly outperformed approaches based on statistical measures of forecast accuracy in terms of economic criteria. Moreover, return‐based approaches that dynamically select only the model with highest weight each period and discard all other models delivered even better results, evidencing not only the advantages of trimming forecast combinations but also the ability of the proposed approach to detect best‐performing models. To analyze the robustness of our results, different levels of risk aversion and a different dataset are considered.     

Model Uncertainty and Forecast Combination in High‐Dimensional Multivariate Volatility Prediction

In multivariate volatility prediction, identifying the optimal forecasting model is not always a feasible task. This is mainly due to the curse of dimensionality typically affecting multivariate volatility models. In practice only a subset of the potentially available models can be effectively estimated, after imposing severe constraints on the dynamic structure of the volatility process. It follows that in most applications the working forecasting model can be severely misspecified. This situation leaves scope for the application of forecast combination strategies as a tool for improving the predictive accuracy. The aim of the paper is to propose some alternative combination strategies and compare their performances in forecasting high‐dimensional multivariate conditional covariance matrices for a portfolio of US stock returns. In particular, we will consider the combination of volatility predictions generated by multivariate GARCH models, based on daily returns, and dynamic models for realized covariance matrices, built from intra‐daily returns. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Optimal forecast error as an unbiased estimator of abnormal return: A proposition

In the event studies, the accuracy of the abnormal returns assessment is highly dependent on the accuracy of the preceding expected return model. If the expected return model is inadequate, there is a possibility that a part of returns is labeled as abnormal returns even though they are not. Currently, we have a variety of options to set up an expected return model. To obtain unbiased abnormal returns, one should pay attention to the performance of the expected return model. In this research, we propose that the optimal forecast lemma can be consulted beforehand so that minimizing the optimal forecast error in the expected return model will yield unbiased abnormal returns. We introduce and prove a proposition that the optimal forecast error is an unbiased estimator for abnormal return. The proposition induces assessing the performance of abnormal return estimation to preemptively evaluate the out-sample forecast accuracy of the model employed. In an illustrative dataset, we examine various models. The approach requires preliminary computational effort; however, it is useful for accurately obtaining the abnormal return predictions.     

Exploiting Spillovers to Forecast Crashes

We develop Hawkes models in which events are triggered through self‐excitation as well as cross‐excitation. We examine whether incorporating cross‐excitation improves the forecasts of extremes in asset returns compared to only self‐excitation. The models are applied to US stocks, bonds and dollar exchange rates. We predict the probability of crashes in the series and the value at risk (VaR) over a period that includes the financial crisis of 2008 using a moving window. A Lagrange multiplier test suggests the presence of cross‐excitation for these series. Out‐of‐sample, we find that the models that include spillover effects forecast crashes and the VaR significantly more accurately than the models without these effects. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Portfolio managers' and novices' forecasts of risk and return: are there predictable forecast errors?

This study aims to investigate the individual behaviour that underlies the overreaction hypothesis by conducting a controlled experiment. Two areas that were not captured by previous research on the validity of the overreaction hypothesis are investigated. First, actual portfolio managers are employed as forecasters. Second a real‐world assessment task is given in the form of predicting the prices of stocks traded on the exchange on a real time basis. The purpose is to explore return expectations and risk perceptions of portfolio managers as well as financially unsophisticated investors by using point and interval forecasts provided for different forecast horizons in bull and bear markets. Contributions stem from three sources. (1) The use of financially sophisticated subjects for the first time in an experimental framework testing the overreaction hypothesis makes possible to control for the effect of expertise. (2) The use of different forecast horizons controls for the effect of forecast period. (3) The use of real‐time forecasts of specific stocks traded at the stock exchange, for the first time in an experimental framework testing the overreaction hypothesis enables to control for ecological validity. Discussions will be given as to the portfolio managers' versus naive investors' interpolating asset prices from past trends and hedging behaviour, due to their caution in projections of ranges for future prices. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Equity return predictability,its determinants,and profitable trading strategies

This paper explains cross‐market variations in the degree of return predictability using the extreme bounds analysis (EBA). The EBA addresses model uncertainty in identifying robust determinant(s) of cross‐sectional return predictability. Additionally, the paper develops two profitable trading strategies based on return predictability evidence. The result reveals that among the 13 determinants of the cross‐sectional variation of return predictability, only value of stock traded (a measure of liquidity) is found to have robust explanatory power by Leamer's (1985) EBA. However, Sala‐i‐Martin's (1997) EBA reports that value of stock traded, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, level of information and communication technology (ICT) development, governance quality, and corruption perception are robust determinants. We further find that a strategy of buying (selling) aggregate market portfolios of the countries with the highest positive (negative) return predictability statistic in the past 24 months generates statistically significant positive returns in the subsequent 3 to 12 months. In the individual country level, a trading rule of buying (selling) the respective country's aggregate market portfolio, when the return predictability statistic turns out positive (negative), outperforms the conventional buy‐and‐hold strategy for many countries.     

A tug of war of forecasting the US stock market volatility: Oil futures overnight versus intraday information

This study is the first to examine the impacts of overnight and intraday oil futures cross-market information on predicting the US stock market volatility the high-frequency data. In-sample estimations present that high overnight oil futures RV can lead to high RV of the S&P 500. Moreover, negative overnight returns are more powerful than positive components, implying the existence of the leverage effect. From statistical and economic perspectives, out-of-sample results indicate that the decompositions of overnight oil futures and intraday RVs, based on signed intraday returns, can significantly increase the models' predictive ability. Finally, when considering the US stock market overnight effect, the decompositions are still useful to predict volatility, especially during high US stock market fluctuations and high and low EPU states.     

Decision‐Based Forecast Evaluation of UK Interest Rate Predictability

This paper illustrates the importance of density forecasting and forecast evaluation in portfolio decision making. The decision‐making environment is fully described for an investor seeking to optimally allocate her portfolio between long and short Treasury bills, over investment horizons of up to 2 years. We examine the impact of parameter uncertainty and predictability in bond returns on the investor's allocation and we describe how the forecasts are computed and used in this context. Both statistical and decision‐based criteria are used to assess the predictability of returns. Our results show sensitivity to the evaluation criterion used and, in the context of investment decision making under an economic value criterion, we find some potential gain for the investor from assuming predictability. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A high–low model of daily stock price ranges

We observe that daily highs and lows of stock prices do not diverge over time and, hence, adopt the cointegration concept and the related vector error correction model (VECM) to model the daily high, the daily low, and the associated daily range data. The in‐sample results attest to the importance of incorporating high–low interactions in modeling the range variable. In evaluating the out‐of‐sample forecast performance using both mean‐squared forecast error and direction of change criteria, it is found that the VECM‐based low and high forecasts offer some advantages over alternative forecasts. The VECM‐based range forecasts, on the other hand, do not always dominate—the forecast rankings depend on the choice of evaluation criterion and the variables being forecast. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Predicting returns and volatility with macroeconomic variables: evidence from tests of encompassing

Tests of forecast encompassing are used to evaluate one‐step‐ahead forecasts of S&P Composite index returns and volatility. It is found that forecasts over the 1990s made from models that include macroeconomic variables tend to be encompassed by those made from a benchmark model which does not include macroeconomic variables. However, macroeconomic variables are found to add significant information to forecasts of returns and volatility over the 1970s. Often in empirical research on forecasting stock index returns and volatility, in‐sample information criteria are used to rank potential forecasting models. Here, none of the forecasting models for the 1970s that include macroeconomic variables are, on the basis of information criteria, preferred to the relevant benchmark specification. Thus, had investors used information criteria to choose between the models used for forecasting over the 1970s considered in this paper, the predictability that tests of encompassing reveal would not have been exploited. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Quantile forecasting for credit risk management using possibly misspecified hidden Markov models

Recent models for credit risk management make use of hidden Markov models (HMMs). HMMs are used to forecast quantiles of corporate default rates. Little research has been done on the quality of such forecasts if the underlying HMM is potentially misspecified. In this paper, we focus on misspecification in the dynamics and dimension of the HMM. We consider both discrete‐ and continuous‐state HMMs. The differences are substantial. Underestimating the number of discrete states has an economically significant impact on forecast quality. Generally speaking, discrete models underestimate the high‐quantile default rate forecasts. Continuous‐state HMMs, however, vastly overestimate high quantiles if the true HMM has a discrete state space. In the reverse setting the biases are much smaller, though still substantial in economic terms. We illustrate the empirical differences using US default data. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Market timing using combined forecasts and machine learning

Successful market timing strategies depend on superior forecasting ability. We use a sentiment index model, a kitchen sink logistic regression model, and a machine learning model (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, LASSO) to forecast 1‐month‐ahead S&P 500 Index returns. In order to determine how successful each strategy is at forecasting the market direction, a “beta optimization” strategy is implemented. We find that the LASSO model outperforms the other models with consistently higher annual returns and lower monthly drawdowns.     

Empirical analysis and forecasting of volatility dynamics in high‐frequency returns with time‐varying components

We study intraday return volatility dynamics using a time‐varying components approach, and the method is applied to analyze IBM intraday returns. Empirical evidence indicates that with three additive components—a time‐varying mean of absolute returns and two cosine components with time‐varying amplitudes—together they capture very well the pronounced periodicity and persistence behaviors exhibited in the empirical autocorrelation pattern of IBM returns. We find that the long‐run volatility persistence is driven predominantly by daily level shifts in mean absolute returns. After adjusting for these intradaily components, the filtered returns behave much like a Gaussian noise, suggesting that the three‐components structure is adequately specified. Furthermore, a new volatility measure (TCV) can be constructed from these components. Results from extensive out‐of‐sample rolling forecast experiments suggest that TCV fares well in predicting future volatility against alternative methods, including GARCH model, realized volatility and realized absolute value. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.